Home / Insights

Investment Memos

IC Memo vs. Decision Memo vs. Lender Memo

Three memos, three audiences. What belongs in each, what to leave out, and why the same deal needs a different document for the committee, the principal, and the bank.

People use “investment memo” as if it were one document. It is at least three. The same deal, written for an investment committee, for a principal making a hold-or-sell call, and for a lender, are different documents with different jobs. Confusing them is how a memo ends up too long for the reader who has to act and too thin for the one who has to approve.

The IC memo

Audience: an investment committee deciding whether to commit capital. Its job is to let smart people who did not source the deal reach a defensible yes or no. A complete IC memo runs the full arc:

  • Executive summary and recommendation, up front and unambiguous.
  • Market thesis — why this asset, this submarket, now.
  • Business plan — what you will do and what it costs.
  • Underwriting and sensitivities — base case plus the downside that matters.
  • Risk framework — the three or four things that could break the deal, and the mitigant for each.

The discipline is candor about risk. A memo that only argues for the deal tells the committee nothing they can use.

The decision memo

Audience: a principal or owner choosing between paths — hold versus sell, refinance versus recapitalize. The job is not to approve a transaction but to frame a choice. A good decision memo lays the alternatives side by side on the same assumptions, shows the return and risk of each, and makes a recommendation the reader can act on in one sitting. It is shorter than an IC memo and sharper — every page exists to clarify the trade-off.

The lender memo

Audience: a credit officer sizing and pricing a loan. The job is to answer one question — does the cash flow service the debt through a downside. It leads with the security: in-place income, debt-service coverage, debt yield, and the sponsor's track record. The equity story that dominates an IC memo is secondary here; the lender is underwriting protection, not upside.

Written in the sponsor's voice

Whichever memo it is, it should read as if the sponsor wrote it — their brand, their voice, their standards of proof. A memo that reads like a template invites the reader to discount it. The underwriting underneath has to be right; the writing is what gets the right answer read and believed.


Need this on a live deal? Capistrano produces underwriting, lease abstracts, investment memos, and capital-raise materials — AI-leveraged, principal-reviewed.

Request a quote →

← Back to Insights